Valley PEA: C$3.37B NPV, 25% IRR
Snowline Gold Corp.'s Valley in Yukon, Canada has a Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) outlining an after-tax NPV of C$3.37B, an after-tax IRR of 25%, and initial capital of C$1.69B. The mine plan runs 20 years at about 341 koz Au per year.
Snowline Gold Corp.'s Valley has reported Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) results for the gold project in Yukon, Canada. The study headlines an after-tax net present value of C$3.37B at a 5% discount rate. It reflects Snowline Gold Corp.'s (SGD.TO) latest disclosed economics for the asset.
Economics. The after-tax NPV is C$3.37B using a 5% discount rate. After-tax IRR is 25%. Initial capital expenditure is estimated at C$1.69B. The study models a payback period of 2.7 years. All-in sustaining costs are pegged at 844 USD/oz. Economics are based on Base case study price of US$2,150/oz Au; high case US$4,500/oz Au; engineering price US$1,950/oz Au.
Production and mine plan. The project envisions an open-pit operation. Life of mine is 20 years. Average annual production is approximately 341 koz Au. Average head grade is 1.34 g/t Au. Metallurgical recovery averages 92.2%. The open-pit strip ratio is 1.09 : 1.
Resources and ownership. The company holds a 100% interest in the project.
These figures are extracted from Snowline Gold Corp.'s technical disclosures and reflect the most recent PEA on file. Compare this project against other developers and producers in our project economics database, and always verify the numbers against the original technical report before making any investment decision.
Reserves & Resources
| Category | Tonnage | Grade | Contained |
|---|---|---|---|
| Measured | 69.7 Mt | 1.41 g/t Au | 3.15 Moz |
| Indicated | 134.3 Mt | 1.11 g/t Au | 4.79 Moz |
| Measured & Indicated | 204.0 Mt | 1.21 g/t Au | 7.94 Moz |
| Inferred | 44.5 Mt | 0.62 g/t Au | 0.89 Moz |
Our Analysis
- IRR after-tax
- 25%
higher than 23% of 119 projects we track
- NPV after-tax
- C$3.37B
higher than 97% of 189 projects we track
- Initial capex
- C$1.69B
50% of NPV
costlier than 95% of 175 projects we track
- Payback
- 2.7yrs
slower than 74% of 102 projects we track
- Mine life
- 20yrs
- Discount rate
- 5%
- Study price assumption
- Base case study price of US$2,150/oz Au; high case US$4,500/oz Au; engineering price US$1,950/oz Au
- Spot gold today
- $4,152.60/oz
A 25% after-tax IRR puts this project in the bottom quartile of the 119 gold projects we track, ahead of only 23% of them. That is the number to sit with, because it is not a marginal miss: developers typically need roughly 15% after-tax to attract project finance, so this clears the practical hurdle, but it does so without the cushion that separates a financeable project from a comfortable one. The after-tax NPV of C$3.37B ranks above 97% of the 189 gold projects we track, and payback of 2.7 years is moderate, ahead of only 26% of the 102 projects we track on that measure. A large headline NPV sitting on a bottom-quartile IRR is a long-life, capital-heavy shape: 20 years of mine life, with the returns spread thin rather than front-loaded.
The constraint that matters most is funding. Initial capex of C$1.69B is 50% of NPV and roughly 0.6x the company's entire US$2.08B market cap. That is a build worth a large fraction of the equity, and it is the sharpest risk signal here. It is softened by portfolio: this is one of 6 projects we track for the company, so the financing does not rest on a single asset, and the capex ratio sits below 95% of the 175 gold projects we track. Even so, a mid-cap carrying a build of this size against its own equity value has limited room to absorb cost inflation quietly.
Two further caveats. This is a PEA, scoping-level: it may include inferred resources, and its capital estimate typically carries a plus or minus 50% band, so the 50%-of-NPV figure and the IRR should be read as indicative rather than firm. The study's base case of US$2,150/oz sits well below today's live spot of $4,152.60/oz, which leaves genuine upside if prices hold, though the high case of US$4,500/oz is not the base case for a reason. Yukon is a mining-friendly jurisdiction, which supports permitting and development, but it does not resolve the funding question.
The question that decides this project: can a mid-cap fund a C$1.69B build without diluting the equity that the NPV is measured against?
Our take, benchmarked against the project economics in the Mining Stocks database. Figures are estimates drawn from company technical reports — not investment advice; always verify against the source filing.
Get the next one first
Be the first to know about new mining results, and how they compare to other projects.