Cove Underground PEA: $271M NPV, 30% IRR
i-80 Gold Corp.'s Cove Underground in Lander County, Nevada, USA has a Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) outlining an after-tax NPV of $271M and an after-tax IRR of 30%.
i-80 Gold Corp.'s Cove Underground has reported Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) results for the gold project in Lander County, Nevada, USA. The study headlines an after-tax net present value of $271M at a 5% discount rate. It reflects i-80 Gold Corp.'s (IAU.TO) latest disclosed economics for the asset.
Economics. The after-tax NPV is $271M using a 5% discount rate. After-tax IRR is 30%. Economics are based on Base case $2,175/oz Au; alternative case $3,000/oz Au.
Production and mine plan. The project envisions an underground operation. Average annual production is approximately 100 koz Au.
Resources and ownership. Royalties and streams: Toll milling; trucking costs treated as non-cash and increase AISC by ~$75/oz at Cove.
These figures are extracted from i-80 Gold Corp.'s technical disclosures and reflect the most recent PEA on file. Compare this project against other developers and producers in our project economics database, and always verify the numbers against the original technical report before making any investment decision.
Our Analysis
- IRR after-tax
- 30%
higher than 34% of 119 projects we track
- NPV after-tax
- $271M
higher than 38% of 169 projects we track
- Discount rate
- 5%
- Study price assumption
- Base case $2,175/oz Au; alternative case $3,000/oz Au
- Spot gold today
- $4,317.30/oz
Against the 119 gold projects we track, this one's 30% after-tax IRR sits above only 34% of them, and its $271M after-tax NPV ranks above 38% of the 169 in our NPV set. That is the honest starting point: a mid-to-lower-table project, not a standout. The IRR does clear the roughly 15% after-tax threshold developers typically need to attract project finance, so the return is financeable in principle. But clearing a financing hurdle is not the same as being scarce or exceptional, and the peer rank is what tells you which one this is.
The constraint that matters most is scale against the sponsor. A $271M NPV against a US$1.57B market cap is roughly 0.2x, so this asset is a modest slice of a company that carries 9 projects in our coverage. That cuts both ways. It means no single-asset financing cliff, but it also means the equity story does not hinge on this project alone, and a diversified sponsor has less reason to fund it aggressively ahead of its peers. Capital intensity relative to the balance sheet is therefore the real question, not the headline return.
Two caveats sharpen the read. This is a PEA, scoping-level work that may lean on inferred resources and whose capital estimate typically carries a plus or minus 50% band, so treat the numbers as directional rather than bankable. And the study's $2,175/oz base case sits well below today's $4,317.30/oz spot, so the economics are not stretched on price; the $3,000/oz alternative case is closer to the current market. Nevada is a mining-friendly jurisdiction, which supports permitting and execution. The deciding question: can this sponsor advance a scoping-level, mid-table Nevada asset to a funded build without diluting a story that already rests on 9 projects?
Our take, benchmarked against the project economics in the Mining Stocks database. Figures are estimates drawn from company technical reports — not investment advice; always verify against the source filing.
Get the next one first
Every mining project we track, with its study figures and sources, kept up to date. Sign up and download the data right away.
By signing up, you agree to receive marketing emails from Mining Stocks and to our data license. You can unsubscribe at any time. Privacy policy