Gold$2,045.30+0.52%
Silver$23.84-0.18%
Copper$3.85+1.23%
Platinum$912.40-0.33%
Iron Ore$118.50+2.14%
Nickel$16,892-0.89%
URANIUM (U3O8)FEASIBILITY STUDYPROJECT ECONOMICS

Phoenix ISR (Wheeler River) Feasibility Study: C$1.57B NPV, 73% IRR

ByMining Stocks Research
Jul 8, 2026
Source:Denison Mines Corp.
Denison Mines Corp. logo
Related Company
Denison Mines Corp.
$DML.TO
View Company →

Denison Mines Corp.'s Phoenix ISR (Wheeler River) in Athabasca Basin, Northern Saskatchewan, Canada has a Feasibility Study outlining an after-tax NPV of C$1.57B, an after-tax IRR of 73%, and initial capital of C$600M. The proposed mine plan runs 10 years.

Denison Mines Corp.'s Phoenix ISR (Wheeler River) has reported Feasibility Study results for the uranium (u3o8) project in Athabasca Basin, Northern Saskatchewan, Canada. The study headlines an after-tax net present value of C$1.57B at a 8% discount rate. It reflects Denison Mines Corp.'s (DML.TO) latest disclosed economics for the asset.

Economics. The after-tax NPV is C$1.57B using a 8% discount rate. After-tax IRR is 73%. Initial capital expenditure is estimated at C$600M. The study models a payback period of 1 years. All-in sustaining costs are pegged at 18.41 USD/lb U3O8. Economics are based on US$68.89-US$78.36 /lb U3O8 (base case); also quoted at US$100/lb case.

Production and mine plan. The project envisions an isr (in-situ recovery) operation. Life of mine is 10 years. Average head grade is 11.4% U3O8 (M&I resources); 46.0% U3O8 Zone A high-grade domain.

Resources and ownership. The company holds a 95% interest in the project.

These figures are extracted from Denison Mines Corp.'s technical disclosures and reflect the most recent Feasibility Study on file. Compare this project against other developers and producers in our project economics database, and always verify the numbers against the original technical report before making any investment decision.

Reserves & Resources

Mineral Reserves (P&P)
CategoryTonnageGradeContained
Proven & Probable219,000 tonnes11.7% U3O856.7 million lbs U3O8
Mineral Resources (M&I&I)
CategoryTonnageGradeContained
Measured & Indicated280,200 tonnes11.4% U3O870.6M lbs U3O8
Measured & Indicated (Zone A)46.0% U3O856.3M lbs U3O8
Mining Stocks Research

Our Analysis

IRR after-tax
73%

higher than 90% of 335 projects we track

NPV after-tax
C$1.57B

higher than 80% of 433 projects we track

Initial capex
C$600M

38% of NPV

costlier than 70% of 433 projects we track

Payback
1yrs

slower than 10% of 270 projects we track

Mine life
10yrs
Discount rate
8%
Study price assumption
US$68.89-US$78.36 /lb U3O8 (base case); also quoted at US$100/lb case

The outlier here is the combination of a 73% after-tax IRR and a C$600M build cost, a pairing that screens in the top decile of the 335 projects we track. Payback of one year and an NPV of C$1.57B, ranking above 80% of peers, reinforce the picture. The capital-light profile is the real story: the build cost is roughly a tenth of the company's US$3.18B market cap, which means funding risk is minimal for a mid-cap with a 12-project portfolio. This is not a story of a stretched balance sheet chasing a transformative build.

The catch is scale and grade risk, not financing. A 10-year mine life is short for a uranium asset, and the economics hinge on a price band of US$68.89-US$78.36/lb U3O8, with a US$100/lb case quoted as upside. The feasibility study stage is the saving grace: this is a build-ready estimate with a typical plus or minus 15% band, so the returns have earned more confidence than a scoping-level PEA would merit. The Athabasca Basin jurisdiction is a quality signal, though the project is already in construction, which shifts the risk from permitting to execution.

The NPV at roughly 0.4x market cap cuts two ways. Either the market is not crediting the full value of a construction-stage asset, or it is discounting the short mine life and commodity price sensitivity. The one question that decides whether this works: can the operator sustain the grade and throughput assumptions through the early years of production, because a one-year payback leaves little margin for error if the deposit underperforms its feasibility model.

Our take, benchmarked against the project economics in the Mining Stocks database. Figures are estimates drawn from company technical reports — not investment advice; always verify against the source filing.

View the source filing from
Denison Mines Corp.
View Source Filing (PDF) →
◆ ◆ ◆